In last Friday night’s presidential debate, the American public witnessed a show of audacity with a mile-high capitol “A.”   Barack Obama shamelessly declared that the current financial crisis was the “fault of the Bush Administration,” and even attempted to link Senator McCain to this purely Democrat debacle.

And again, this afternoon, right after House Republicans, with the votes of 92 renegade Democrat Representatives, refused to cave to pressure and pass the $700 billion “bailout” package, Obama launched into his blame-the-Republicans act again.  This was a package that was supposedly worked on throughout the weekend in a bi-partisan fashion.  In fact, bi-partisanship has been the code word in the press for these negotiations.

Madame Pelosi took a few minutes to address the House chamber, just prior to the actual vote, and guess what?  She immediately launched into a this-is-all-Bush’s-fault tirade that left House members so understandably infuriated, that the vote failed, the markets immediately plunged and still the mainstream press continues its job of spouting 24/7 propaganda for the socialist Democrat Party USA and their candidate, Barack Obama.   This is the most disgusting display of creating a smoke screen to escape proper accountability.  Democrats are up to their very necks in fault for this crisis that never had to happen in the first place.

Watch Imperious Nancy’s tawdry display of politics-as-usual gab:

At least, some good has come of this.  We aren’t saddled yet with the bills for their cover-up.  The public has begun to take notice; Congressional offices have been flooded with calls and emails from angry constituents.  The public is heatedly against this bill and favors the Republican alternative, which is an insurance corporation similar to the FDIC.  And John McCain has a chance to blow wide open the attempted cover-up by Democrats of their own failure to do their jobs and oversee Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac.

We need a whole lot of praying going on!  The Democrats cannot be allowed to get away with this cover-up/blame game in order to bolster their candidates in the upcoming election.  That is their only objective.  In their hands, the Country be damned.  With a press intent on an Obama victory — no matter what! — the only people who can get this story out are we, the people.

Are there any worse scoundrels, than those who would sell out their Country for nothing but power and money?  These Democrats deserve tar and feathers and a quick trip to the pokey.

The whole thing makes me sick.

Will there be enough Pepto Bismol to get us through this election season?

Thanks only to an army of outraged conservatives and Republican House members, under the leadership of John Boehner, the millions of dollars that could so easily have been funneled to ACORN have been removed from the Bailout Package.

According to Politico:  http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0908/ACORN_outrage_removes_affordable_housing_provision.html

“After several days of rage from conservative activists regarding a provision in the bailout bill that would send some of the profits from the sale of distressed assets the goverment buys into an affordable housing trust fund, congressional negotiators have removed section 105(d) of the bailout proposal, according to aides on both side.”

Before striking this add-on, the $700 billion bailout package included a provision for roughly 20% of funds being set aside for low-income mortages of precisely the type that got us into this mess in the first place.  The money would have been given to state and local governments to use at their own discretion, and the chief beneficiary of these type funds in the past has been ACORN.  ACORN then plays hardball with lending institutions, threatening them with mass actions, angry protests, etc. if they don’t make it easy for those who can’t pay back to borrow money.

Republicans in Congress had called this provision in the bailout a deal-breaker.  Thank the Good Lord someone is watching out for the taxpayers.

I have never, in my life, seen such out and out lying from any politicians as from all Democrats on this financial debacle.  Trying to blame this on Bush and the Republicans is despicable.  Especially when the evidence of their own malfeasance is EVERYWHERE.

Here’s more:

Democrats were the FAMILY of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac!  Especially Barack Obama!

How dare this man, Barack Obama, stand in front of millions of Americans and tell them this financial crisis is the fault of those who have no blame, while he and his friends and his party have gotten rich off the taxpayers.  If Obama is elected, we will have more of this until we are finally hammered into the ground and there is nothing left of America.

I’ve never been this disgusted.

I’ve been sitting on my hands all week because I am a money ninny, and when the only words that matter happen to be “financial crisis,” I know enough to keep my mouth shut and my hands stowed.  I’ve read plenty, to be sure, but still could not get a good enough handle on the big picture to write about it.

Then, today, I found this video, which is the best explanation I’ve seen and gives the biggest picture I’ve seen of the whole thing.  It gives sources, clearly demonstrates how the sub-prime meltdown caused what is happening now, and how the fault lies squarely in the laps of Democrats, including Barack Obama himself.

If this man had an ounce of real integrity, honesty or true concern for real people, he would come clean.  Instead, he is behaving like nearly all shamelessly guilty people from history, whose only defense is to point fingers at the innocent and play upon people’s gullibility and trust.  This is disgraceful.  If he were my son, I would honestly believe I was a complete failure as a mother.  I am ashamed for this man, who dares to call himself a leader worthy of the Presidency.

Here is the video: 

Well, the cat’s really out of the bag now.  We’re getting to the heart of precisely why the liberal press - our entire mainstream press - really despise Sarah Palin.

It’s about her religion, silly.

This is the paper that refused to print the Mohammed cartoons that caused riots and bloodshed all around the world by inflamed, insulted Muslims.  This is the paper that explained its position thus:

Philip Kennicott [WaPo staff writer]: I think the Post has remained consistent to its values throughout this. I asked Len Downie, our executive editor, about why we haven’t run them [the Danish cartoons]. He sent me this message:

“It would violate our standards for taste to publish them. We keep many things out of the paper on those grounds, including gratuitous nudity, violence, obscenity and racial, ethnic and religious slurs.”

That seems right to me. It’s not paternalism, but the basic values of the institution. And one of those rules that, while it’s not always possible to live by it 100 percent, if you constantly aim for it, you’re better off.

Conclusion?  This isn’t rocket science, is it?

Obviously, the Washington Post realizes that they need not fear rioting, angry, torch-carrying Christians, who would storm their offices and burn them to the ground, hoping to kill as many newspaper people as possible in the rampage.

Obviously, the Washington Post has no genuine standards.

Obviously, the Washington Post fears reprisals from the “religion of peace,” Islam, but certainly not from the real warmongering Christians.

What’s to say now?

Not much, really.  Clearly, the Washington Post has made a decision here.  Protect Muslims at all cost.  And if there is a choice to be made about which religion deserves respect and protection in the U.S.A., it’s Islam.

Interestingly enough, their candidate, Barack Obama agrees with them 100%.

From the Audacity of Hope, p. 261:

“…that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

Straight from the horse’s mouth.  Obama and the Washington Post choose to stand with Islamists, not Christians.

Anyone else outraged by this?  Even a little bit?

Then join the club of offended, indignant, outraged Christians